[bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)

Mario Massa Admin at weaklinks.net
Wed Feb 23 16:55:57 EST 2005


GOING OFF SUBJECT I TOO HAVE A FEW SERVERS AND EVERY USER HAS COMPLAINED OF
LAG But it might be cause by BBO if installed if a few of you guys can get
in touch with me to get to the bottom line of this lag issues
Weaklinks at msn.com or http://bf1942.lightcubed.com pm me there called
Weaklinks


-----Original Message-----
From: James Gurney [mailto:james at globalmegacorp.org] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 1:48 AM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: [bf1942] Punkbuster (Was: How could DICE agree to this??)

On 2/22/2005 7:46 PM, Neal Clayton wrote:
> 2) An improved engine that doesn't suffer horribly from lag caused by 
> punkbuster

Speaking of which, has anyone else had reports of really bad server lag 
in the last couple of weeks? I'm not talking network latency.. one of 
our players has a network ping of 9ms, so that's not it.. he (as well as 
many others) have complained about the server apparently running 
sluggishly. Server cpu never goes over 40%.. I watched the console and 
the server FPS was high, and utilitization reasonable.. On a whim, I've 
disabled PB and so far, the reports seem to have indicated that the 
problem is solved, although I'm not willing to take this as 100% proof 
yet.. Mmm, 100% proof.. er, anyway, has anyone else seen similar behaviour?

James




More information about the Bf1942 mailing list