[bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?

[Jon Wolberg]

I just did, and it does state that.  Someone at EA must have given you wrong 
info.  E-mail me off-list please.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Rayne" <rayne at bf2-maps.com>
To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 11:58 AM
Subject: RE: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?


>I get them from EA directly sir. There is not slot requirement on the
> requirement in forfilling your obligation to EA. It only states that you
> must run those amounts per clients, etc. Ranked servers must be at least
> 16-slots but are not required to be higher. If you are a 'trusted 
> provider'
> then I suggest you read what they sent you carefully as you would be 
> hosting
> much more than what they detail you to do. If you choose to make them 
> bigger
> then nobody is stopping you. But the minimum requirements is what I stated
> and those are indeed facts.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:jon at defenderhosting.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:57 AM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?
>
> I dont know where you got your requirements, but they are wrong.
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Rayne" <rayne at bf2-maps.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:48 AM
> Subject: RE: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?
>
>
>>I quoted their base requirements. There is no requirement to run a 64-slot
>> server in the "trusted provider" rules.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jon Wolberg [mailto:jon at defenderhosting.com]
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:21 AM
>> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?
>>
>> 16 slot?  Try 64 slot.
>> ----- Original Message ----- 
>> From: "Rayne" <rayne at bf2-maps.com>
>> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:17 AM
>> Subject: RE: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?
>>
>>
>>> [rant]
>>>
>>> Are you blind or just drunk? To become a "trusted provider" you have to
>>> fire
>>> up 10 16-slot servers for the gaming community. Then for every 10 
>>> servers
>>> you sell you have to fire up another one. ALL to the benefit of EA's
>>> ranked
>>> server system. Personally, I think that having individual stats in a
>>> team-based game is completely destructive to the environment of the 
>>> game.
>>> We've got snipers sitting outside of spawn, chopper pilots hovering over
>>> spawns and nobody is trying to take a flag to win the map. You call that
>>> good gameplay? How about the beautiful little mod that DC had that would
>>> kill you if you entered the opponent's main base for more than 5-10
>>> seconds?
>>> How about make the ranked servers have their own little world and let 
>>> the
>>> modding communities and custom maps be run ONLY on unranked servers 
>>> where
>>> players want to WIN and not just pad their "ranked" scores.
>>>
>>> [/rant]
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ScratchMonkey [mailto:ScratchMonkey at MatureAsskickers.net]
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2005 10:10 AM
>>> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>>> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Anyone have a popular non-ranked server?
>>>
>>> --On Tuesday, August 16, 2005 9:42 AM -0400 Dave Snodgrass
>>> <packtloss at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> They didnt invest all this time/effort into mods and stats, if they 
>>>> dont
>>>> plan to profit from them.
>>>
>>> Wait a minute. Didn't somebody say EA doesn't profit from the ranked
>>> server
>>> program?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>