[bf1942] dynamic and static?

James Gurney james at globalmegacorp.org
Mon May 24 22:08:04 EDT 2004

I've found that the static seems a lot more stable on my Opteron server. 
We used to get 4 or 5 crashes a day on an Athlon based server. Now using 
the static on the Opteron machine, we go 4 or 5 days without having a 
crash.. YMMV.

On 5/24/2004 6:22 PM, Steven Hartland wrote:
> One will use ur current system's libraries if compatible the other
> will use inbuilt versions. Usually the only reason to use the static
> versions is that they can be more stable on some platforms.
> There is usually not a difference in performance.
>     Steve / K
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "AIX Gaming" <webmaster at aixgaming.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2004 2:17 AM
> Subject: [bf1942] dynamic and static?
>>Hi, can someone explain what the difference is between the dynamic and
>>static binaries for the bfv linux distribution?  I'm having problems with
>>constant jerkyness now after having 2 days of good gameplay at 40 players
>>on a very capable server.  Would the dynamic be better than the static?
>>What do these things actually do differently?  Thanks.
> ================================================
> This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. 
> In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137
> or return the E.mail to postmaster at multiplay.co.uk.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3198 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20040524/bb7b43c2/attachment.bin>

More information about the Bf1942 mailing list