Ian Merwin ian at liontrax.com
Mon Feb 2 11:39:36 EST 2004

I MD5'ed and its exact
Ive tried 4 dif downloads from dif mirrors etc.
All to the same end
Even the RC2 gives me the same 

Its somen about our box...

P3 L440 Intel Server board 
Dual 800mhz 1.2 GB ram
Ultra 320 hd's (mirrored)
RedHat latest Kernel 

I know its prob. *under powered* (p3 2x800mhz)

But am just experimenting before building new server

-----Original Message-----
From: David Snodgrass [mailto:dave at pmmci.com] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 9:29 AM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: RE: [bf1942] =( ARRRRGGGGGHHHHH!

The binaries are in the .run - His .run would not extract.
Md5 sum of file.run compared to real file.run would at least let him
confirm his downloads are not corrupted - The .run file was what we were
trying to confirm was not corrupted - IF you look at his original post,
the .run file is not extracting.

-----Original Message-----
From: AthlonRob [mailto:AthlonRob at axpr.net] 
Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:29 AM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: RE: [bf1942] =( ARRRRGGGGGHHHHH!

On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 08:06, David Snodgrass wrote:
> Andreas gives us md5s of the binaries, but not of the archives - would

> be

Since the .run file contains the archives, if the code in the .run file
were the same, but the archives altered by one byte, the md5sum would
change... so if the run file checks out okay, then the archives are


More information about the Bf1942 mailing list