[bf1942] Linux patch ETA
Michael Ressen
netadmin at michiganburbs.com
Mon Dec 6 18:34:06 EST 2004
Agreed.
Haven't tried CoD yet. I did put up RTCW-ET, and that runs nice.
Still trying to find a stable way to do Far Cry, but I may just dump
that idea altogether lol.
/BA
Rick Thompson wrote:
> That is not at issue here. Regardless of how long it took to hack the
> code out it should have been finished and released concurrently with
> the win32 version.
>
> Everybody screws up occasionally, I can accept and understand that.
> What I can't understand is why the hell we don't have a patch now, at
> least five days after the original blunder was discovered.
>
> We lost two servers today and I'd be surprised if we didn't lose more,
> that I understand very well.
>
> There has been a shift somewhere in EA because they have never been
> this blatantly indifferent to their userbase before, at least not
> since we started hosting BF. I don't like the signals I am seeing
> about BF2 nix support either, between that and this current patch
> fiasco I now have zero confidence in anything they say.
>
> Is anyone hosting Call of Duty? What's the cpu time like and are there
> any server manager apps for it?
>
> Rick
>
>
> At 12:05 PM 12/5/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>
>> Unless the Linux codebase is a seperate branch....?? I guess that's
>> never been made clear to us.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.806 / Virus Database: 548 - Release Date: 12/5/2004
>
>
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list