[bf1942] Linux patch ETA

Michael Ressen netadmin at michiganburbs.com
Mon Dec 6 18:34:06 EST 2004


Agreed.

Haven't tried CoD yet.   I did put up RTCW-ET, and that runs nice.   
Still trying to find a stable way to do Far Cry, but I may just dump 
that idea altogether lol.

/BA

Rick Thompson wrote:

> That is not at issue here. Regardless of how long it took to hack the 
> code out it should have been finished and released concurrently with 
> the win32 version.
>
> Everybody screws up occasionally, I can accept and understand that. 
> What I can't understand is why the hell we don't have a patch now, at 
> least five days after the original blunder was discovered.
>
> We lost two servers today and I'd be surprised if we didn't lose more, 
> that I understand very well.
>
> There has been a shift somewhere in EA because they have never been 
> this blatantly indifferent to their userbase before, at least not 
> since we started hosting BF. I don't like the signals I am seeing 
> about BF2 nix support either, between that and this current patch 
> fiasco I now have zero confidence in anything they say.
>
> Is anyone hosting Call of Duty? What's the cpu time like and are there 
> any server manager apps for it?
>
> Rick
>
>
> At 12:05 PM 12/5/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>
>> Unless the Linux codebase is a seperate branch....??   I guess that's 
>> never been made clear to us.
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>---
>Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.806 / Virus Database: 548 - Release Date: 12/5/2004
>  
>




More information about the Bf1942 mailing list