[bf1942] Linux patch ETA
Rick Thompson
rick at fortweb.com
Mon Dec 6 18:17:12 EST 2004
That is not at issue here. Regardless of how long it took to hack the code
out it should have been finished and released concurrently with the win32
version.
Everybody screws up occasionally, I can accept and understand that. What I
can't understand is why the hell we don't have a patch now, at least five
days after the original blunder was discovered.
We lost two servers today and I'd be surprised if we didn't lose more, that
I understand very well.
There has been a shift somewhere in EA because they have never been this
blatantly indifferent to their userbase before, at least not since we
started hosting BF. I don't like the signals I am seeing about BF2 nix
support either, between that and this current patch fiasco I now have zero
confidence in anything they say.
Is anyone hosting Call of Duty? What's the cpu time like and are there any
server manager apps for it?
Rick
At 12:05 PM 12/5/2004 -0600, you wrote:
>Unless the Linux codebase is a seperate branch....?? I guess that's
>never been made clear to us.
-------------- next part --------------
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.806 / Virus Database: 548 - Release Date: 12/5/2004
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list