[bf1942] Help with +priorityDaemon 1 - Only works at start ?

[Andreas Fredriksson]

Make sure you're running the latest update to the server,
there was a bug earlier on where the +priorityDaemon option
was lost between map changes.

// Andreas

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Richards [mailto:noxis at clara.net] 
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 8:06 PM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: [bf1942] Help with +priorityDaemon 1 - Only works at start ?
> 
> 
> The NI value only seems to change for when the server 
> initially starts, the value changes to 10 but on a map change 
> it doesnt. Just changes to 0.
> 
> I am the only one experiancing this?
> 
> I was very excited about this feature and changed all my 
> servers over to Gentoo now from WinXP. Spec as below in 
> previous email.
> 
> Cheers for any help.
> 
> Paul.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Paul Richards" <noxis at clara.net>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 2:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Help with +priorityDaemon 1
> 
> 
> > aaah fantastic, thanks
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Andreas Fredriksson" <andreas.fredriksson at dice.se>
> > To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 1:57 PM
> > Subject: RE: [bf1942] Help with +priorityDaemon 1
> >
> >
> > >
> > > You need to run the daemon as root, otherwise it can't reset the 
> > > niceness back to zero after loading is complete.
> > >
> > > // Andreas
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Paul Richards [mailto:noxis at clara.net]
> > > > Sent: Monday, September 22, 2003 2:51 PM
> > > > To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> > > > Subject: [bf1942] Help with +priorityDaemon 1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am running a Gentoo based linux system with dual AMD 2400's 
> > > > 1.5gb of ram gentoo-sources kernel
> > > >
> > > > I have compiled the bfpridaemon etc... all seems to be working. 
> > > > Its given the BF1942 server a NI value of 10, isnt this 
> going to 
> > > > set the server to be constantly a lower priority than all the 
> > > > other tasks with a NI value of 0 ?
> > > >
> > > > I thought the idea was for it to only lower the priority during 
> > > > the server loading and map changes? (essentially the 
> same thing).
> > > >
> > > > If anyone could help I would be greatful
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Paul
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> 
>