[bf1942] Linux server status report: 2003-03-31

Stewart, John johns at artesyncp.com
Mon Mar 31 13:24:50 EST 2003


> How about a static version and a dynamic version?  That way 
> we can choose 
> which one we want to run.  The solution should NOT be 
> maintaining both a 
> gcc2 and gcc3 build, though.

What is your objection to a static version? Binary size? If you've got enough bandwidth to run a bf1942 server, surely you have enough bandwidth to download a few hundered megs, right?

johnS 



More information about the Bf1942 mailing list