[bf1942] Linux server status report: 2003-03-31
Stewart, John
johns at artesyncp.com
Mon Mar 31 13:24:50 EST 2003
> How about a static version and a dynamic version? That way
> we can choose
> which one we want to run. The solution should NOT be
> maintaining both a
> gcc2 and gcc3 build, though.
What is your objection to a static version? Binary size? If you've got enough bandwidth to run a bf1942 server, surely you have enough bandwidth to download a few hundered megs, right?
johnS
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list