AW: [bf1942] Where can i DL
roger
rogerxxmaillist at san.rr.com
Sun Mar 16 21:42:10 EST 2003
On Sun, 2003-03-16 at 17:11, Don Kukral wrote:
> It seems the only problem we have here is that EA suprised Ryan with a
> point release but I am sure he is off working on it. I will not go sign
> some petition just because somebody says to. Especially with
> misinformation like the comment about RTR. I think Ryan and EA are doing
> a great job. It sure would be nice to have a little more communication
> from Ryan but as a coder I can accept that communication probably isn't
> very high on his TODO list.
Who said that signing a petition will cause an action as somebody using
a baseball bat on EA's knee's? I do not see a petition as being either
politically nor publically harmful.
I think you're looking at the issue wrong. If a large party signs a
petition or a complaint about something and people actually take the
time to do something, most people are sometimes surprised by the
response and may actually fix something.
Do you live in a communist country that hinders free speech or what???
> So, I would just like to say this, before we all run off and sign a
> petition to EA that could cause more problems than it is worth.
eh. that quote reminds me of WWII (with all this crap going on).
A statement from the WWII era might read as such, "What's all this fuss
about just a few jews missing from society?" lol I can go "on and on"
about that era as I've studied some political science.
> Please
> remember that Ryan already tasked with doing what you are asking EA to
> do. They could just decide that he isn't doing a good enough job or that
> it just isn't worth the effort and pull the plug on the whole thing. So
> why don't we just give it some more time and actually see what the guy
> doing the work has to say about the whole thing.
bah. consumers pay the $$$ and there is a demand for a
product/service. people are just voicing that they want a product.
your statement is similar to me saying, "Bah. Who needs Windows
Updates?" (my point being, updates to code are there for the demand for
security as a linux server update is requested by the consumers becuase
they too have a demand for this also!).
The last thing i'd like to say is that the only person whom knows if
Ryan is doing a good job would be Ryan's boss himself. I have no idea
whom ryan is and for all i know, his boss's name is Sgt Carter (no
offense ryan ;-).
>
> -dk
> (http://lotl.cc/)
>
>
> cuban at hoodedmaniac.com wrote:
>
> >I was just about to say the same thing. For those of us who have BF but
> >not RTR. We should boycott RTR until linux server is released.
> >
> >cuban
> >
> >
> >
> >>If no support for linux then don't buy RTR.
> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >> Von: +Mc+ FragMeister [mailto:fragmeister at mc-clan.com]
> >> Gesendet: Sonntag, 16. März 2003 22:18
> >> An: bf1942 at icculus.org
> >> Betreff: RE: [bf1942] Where can i DL
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Andrew,
> >>
> >> None yet, but can you please go and sign this petition, and ask all
> >> gamers
> >>you know to also sign it?
> >>
> >> http://www.petitiononline.com/bf19422/petition.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks !
> >>
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andrew Parisio [mailto:wkyasnipehunt at hotmail.com]
> >> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 1:49 PM
> >> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> >> Subject: [bf1942] Where can i DL
> >>
> >>
> >> The newest version?
> >>
> >> I don’t see it anywhere on icculus.org and don’t remember where I
> >> got
> >>the older version 1.3
> >>
> >> Is there a 1.31? I haven’t kept up with the mailing list.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> Andrew
> >>
> >>
>
>
--
Roger
http://www.eskimo.com/~roger/index.html
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list