[bf1942] Two identical boxes... two different usages?
Alex Lembesis
alex at elitedesigns.net
Mon Jan 20 09:58:52 EST 2003
Nope, there are no players in either of the servers.
-----Original Message-----
From: Killing [mailto:killing at barrysworld.com]
Sent: Monday, January 20, 2003 9:59 AM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: Re: [bf1942] Two identical boxes... two different usages?
You dont / shouldn't its done dynamically by the kernel. Most likely 1
server has
more players.
Steve / K
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Lembesis" <alex at elitedesigns.net>
To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
Sent: 20 January 2003 14:46
Subject: [bf1942] Two identical boxes... two different usages?
I have two linux bf servers running off of identical machines. RH 7.2, P4
2.0GHz 512 RAM 100mbit connection. Check out what top reports from the two
of them.
bfsrv01
10:43am up 8:54, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
25 processes: 23 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 7.5% user, 1.8% system, 0.0% nice, 90.5% idle
Mem: 514104K av, 136764K used, 377340K free, 0K shrd, 4468K
buff
Swap: 1044216K av, 0K used, 1044216K free 62108K
cached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
972 xsbf1942 15 0 75800 74M 15988 S 5.6 14.7 31:39 bf1942_lnxded
bfsrv02
10:33am up 24 min, 1 user, load average: 0.43, 0.31, 0.17
25 processes: 22 sleeping, 3 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
CPU states: 50.0% user, 2.9% system, 0.0% nice, 47.0% idle
Mem: 514104K av, 141012K used, 373092K free, 0K shrd, 4312K
buff
Swap: 1044216K av, 0K used, 1044216K free 62444K
cached
PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
1033 dygital 17 0 78624 76M 15580 R 49.4 15.2 2:15 bf1942_lnxded
My question is... Look at the PRI. bfsrv02 has much higher CPU utilization
with a PRI of 17. bfsrv01 has much lower CPU utilization on PRI 15. How do
I change this PRI?
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list