[bf1942] New build.

[g8 at the.whole.net]

Hi Killing, why a bad idea?  It would allow for more granular control
(facilities and levels), logging to a remote host, managing logs centrally
(especially for those of us who already have syslog systems in place), not
to mention it's a whole logging subsystem already built and ready to be
used.

Yet another daemon output file would just be one more random logfile to
manage.  However, the ideal world is to have both like many other daemons.

-g8

On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Killing wrote:

> Bad idea IMO configurable level to a file is fine thanks :D
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scratch Monkey" <ScratchMonkey at SewingWitch.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: 06 January 2003 22:33
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] New build.
>
>
> > --On Monday, January 06, 2003 5:18 PM -0500 g8 at the.whole.net wrote:
> >
> > > Having it talk to syslog(3) at its apropriate priorities would be really
> > > nice (and all this output could be the LOG_DEBUG level).
> >
> > Good idea. Just need a way to specify the facility code.