[bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan? Hello?

[Zkast Admin]

yea usally 84M to 92M at start up,  i seen it idle for a few days with min
action then a ton of action with memory shooting up to 225M  still ran good
though except the 1.3 issues/

----- Original Message -----
From: "David M. Graham" <grahd at cwfh.com>
To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 6:06 PM
Subject: RE: [bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan? Hello?


> I would have to agree that he has some sort of memory leak.  My server
> has been quiet.  But has been up for 3 days straight.  Here is the line
> from TOP
>
> 44 processes: 42 sleeping, 2 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
> CPU states:  0.0% user,  0.2% system,  0.0% nice, 99.8% idle
> Mem:  1029504K av,  364552K used,  664952K free,       0K shrd,   41308K
> buff
> Swap: 2040244K av,       0K used, 2040244K free                  137576K
> cached
>
>   PID USER     PRI  NI  SIZE  RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM   TIME COMMAND
>    67 root      15   0 88580  86M 15200 S     0.0  8.6  29:28
> bf1942_lnxded
>
> but then again look at my total memory
>
> D
>
> aKa
> Sgt Firewalker
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DLinkOZ [mailto:dlinkoz at oesm.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 14:30
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan? Hello?
>
> I think the best thing you could do is list your system specs, OS specs,
> etc
> for Ryan and explain what's happening.  Tell him what you've got and
> that
> the server is running wild on memory consumption.  A one liner in all
> caps
> saying it's too high does him absolutely no good at all.  700mb... are
> you
> sure there's not some cached memory you're not seeing?  Top actually
> says
> the bf1942_lnxded process is using 700mb?  It's not necessarily a code
> issue, because it's not happening to everyone.  Might be some sort of
> combination of OS version and hardware that's causing it, and obviously
> I'm
> not using that combination since I experience no leaks.  Until Ryan can
> see
> what hardware and what OS' are exhibiting this problem, it will be hard
> for
> him to nail it down.
>
> My point is, sending an email to the list with a simple line of "NO
> DEDIDICATED SERVER SHOULD NEED THIS MUCH MEMORY!" does whoever codes the
> product absolutely no good.  You might as well just tell him the gross
> national product of Finland... it would help as much in his coding
> efforts.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Daniel Valois" <ninzor at packet-kids.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan? Hello?
>
>
> > if you buy into capitol letters as shouting then perhaps you should
> > reevaluate your priorities. I dont think it needs over 700 Mb of
> memory.
> and
> > i dont need some smartass to tell me it's a beta. perhaps a memory
> leak
> that
> > ryan needs to look at. Or perhaps some more stripping down of the
> client
> > portion is in order.this is what this list is for. WOW. YOU QUOTED
> BILL
> > GATES. get back in line with the rest of the sheep
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Reinder P. Gerritsen" <reinder at strikerz.net>
> > To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 2:08 PM
> > Subject: RE: [bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan? Hello?
> >
> >
> > > Bill Gates once said: 640kb of RAM, that ought to be all that man
> should
> > > EVER need in his computer...
> > >
> > > Then why oh wy do I have almost a thousand times more that amount in
> my
> > > box at home? And over three-thousand times on my dedicated server
> box?
> > > My HL servers each use around 96 MB of mem, could be tweaked and
> > > limited, but that effects performance. Anyway, no one ever explained
> to
> > > you that CAPITOLS are considered shouding, and shouting on an
> > > mailing-list usualy is linked to flaming and ranting?
> > >
> > > When does the name BETA finally ring a bell in your head? It's not
> like
> > > you're running an 6 year old fully developed QuakeWorld CTF server
> 12
> > > player here you know... Memory requirements GROW.
> > >
> > > Perhaps you could be right, but as long as you keep on going CAPS on
> > > oneliners, don't expect many guy's on the list to take you serious
> here.
> > > It just feels like ranting on Ryan accusing him for doing a lousy
> job...
> > >
> > > Fox
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Daniel Valois [mailto:ninzor at packet-kids.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 7:28 PM
> > > To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> > > Subject: Re: Re: Re[3]: [bf1942] Status of Linux server? Ryan?
> Hello?
> > >
> > >
> > > NO DEDIDICATED SERVER SHOULD NEED THIS MUCH MEMORY!
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>