[bf1942] 1.3 version?
Rick Buford
rickbuford at greeblesnort.com
Mon Feb 3 20:58:22 EST 2003
must be there to compensate for all the missing overhead of a winblows
box =)
Rick
Nelson Bartley wrote:
> PSST!
>
> It's not a bug, it's a feature. DUH!
>
> Gizmotech.
>
> On Mon, 2003-02-03 at 18:09, Alex Lembesis wrote:
>
>>/me awaits this new patch :) Will our friendly '30ms bug' still be with us?
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Killing [mailto:killing at barrysworld.com]
>>Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 5:14 PM
>>To: bf1942 at icculus.org
>>Subject: Re: [bf1942] 1.3 version?
>>
>>
>>LOL :)
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "Ryan C. Gordon" <icculus at clutteredmind.org>
>>To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>>Sent: 03 February 2003 22:04
>>Subject: Re: [bf1942] 1.3 version?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Yust noticed that EA has released the 1.3 patch for the clients and W32
>>>server. Is there any ETA (days/months/years/eternity) for a 1.3 version
>>>linux server?
>>
>>I'm merging this as we speak. Er...type. Er...you know what I mean.
>>
>>--ryan.
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list