[bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6

[Gareth Jones]

Oh absolutely. I vote for this too.

BT is good for specific purposes, and it doesnt suit this at all I think.
How pissed off would users get if their valuable (and often limited) upload
was co-opted while they were in-game to serve up maps to someone else? (
Especially if their uploads counted towards their monthly download limits
from their ISP - hi Trog).

HTTP redirects are a much much better solution, I reckon.

Gareth.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lee Latham" <leeprivate at cgmlarson.com>
To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 7:17 AM
Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6


> yeah i agree too..it's probably the simplest way available.
>
> could it be that there is a consensus?
>
> At 02:46 PM 12/4/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >Ditto
> >
> >Jon
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Steven Hartland" <killing at barrysworld.com>
> >To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> >Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 2:04 PM
> >Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
> >
> >
> > > I'll second that!!! As I've said before fantastic piece of
functionality
> >originally used
> > > in UT :)
> > >
> > >     Steve / K
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Andrew Chen" <achen-bf1942 at divo.net>
> > > To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> > > Sent: 04 December 2003 18:34
> > > Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'd prefer just a straight HTTP redirect to a user-specified
webserver.
> > >