[bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
Alex
SantaHomer at web.de
Tue Dec 2 11:53:13 EST 2003
Andreas, PUNKBUSTER isnt a Tool which helps.
Why didnt you get in contact with UnitedAdmins?
alex
----- Original Message -----
From: Andreas Fredriksson
To: 'bf1942 at icculus.org'
Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:46 PM
Subject: RE: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
Well, I did the PB integration and carefully throttled the bandwidth
so that you'll hardly notice PB updates as a player on an ISDN link.
The BF integration is unique in this regard because screenshots and
net speeds for PB are all throttled by the game's own network layer.
I can't see the point in complaining about lag until you've even tried
the system.
// Andreas
> -----Original Message-----
> From: www clan - Starkness [mailto:starkness at wwwclan.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:15 PM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: RE: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
>
>
> Sad but true. When you try to update their client or server
> side software patches through your console in the game
> (sof2), it takes forever for their servers to respond and
> send you the patch. I have watched pings soar in SOF2 from
> 40's and 50's to never below 100 and this affected everyone
> playing the game, after punkbuster took over. Their
> technique of catching punk ass bitches is paying off in some
> circles, i.e.. a whole slew of punks from top clans were
> removed from CAL sof2 ladder just recently because of being
> caught by pb. There are pro's and con's to pb but it took a
> lot of the fun out of SOF2 because lag is attributed to their
> overloaded jacked-up servers/lousy connection?
>
> Thank God other games are just on the horizon. IMHO bf1942
> is going to suck after pb takes over...
>
> my $.02
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven Hartland [mailto:killing at barrysworld.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:24 AM
> To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
>
>
> Time will only tell but from my experiences with PB it causes
> more problems for the admin than it solves :(
>
> Steve / K
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "SySt3M" <syst3m at downclan.com>
> To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
>
>
> > I'm the same, I think its great that DICE are at least
> addressing the
> issue.
> >
> > >i disagree
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20031202/d62f1ac9/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list