[bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6

Alex SantaHomer at web.de
Tue Dec 2 11:53:13 EST 2003


Andreas, PUNKBUSTER isnt a Tool which helps.

Why didnt you get in contact with UnitedAdmins?

alex 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Andreas Fredriksson 
  To: 'bf1942 at icculus.org' 
  Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:46 PM
  Subject: RE: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6


  Well, I did the PB integration and carefully throttled the bandwidth
  so that you'll hardly notice PB updates as a player on an ISDN link.

  The BF integration is unique in this regard because screenshots and
  net speeds for PB are all throttled by the game's own network layer.

  I can't see the point in complaining about lag until you've even tried
  the system.

  // Andreas

  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: www clan - Starkness [mailto:starkness at wwwclan.com] 
  > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 5:15 PM
  > To: bf1942 at icculus.org
  > Subject: RE: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
  > 
  > 
  > Sad but true.  When you try to update their client or server 
  > side software patches through your console in the game 
  > (sof2), it takes forever for their servers to respond and 
  > send you the patch.  I have watched pings soar in SOF2 from 
  > 40's and 50's to never below 100 and this affected everyone 
  > playing the game, after punkbuster took over.  Their 
  > technique of catching punk ass bitches is paying off in some 
  > circles, i.e..  a whole slew of punks from top clans were 
  > removed from CAL sof2 ladder just recently because of being 
  > caught by pb.  There are pro's and con's to pb but it took a 
  > lot of the fun out of SOF2 because lag is attributed to their 
  > overloaded jacked-up servers/lousy connection?
  > 
  > Thank God other games are just on the horizon.  IMHO bf1942 
  > is going to suck after pb takes over...
  > 
  > my $.02
  > 
  > 
  > 
  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: Steven Hartland [mailto:killing at barrysworld.com]
  > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:24 AM
  > To: bf1942 at icculus.org
  > Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
  > 
  > 
  > Time will only tell but from my experiences with PB it causes 
  > more problems for the admin than it solves :(
  > 
  >     Steve / K
  > ----- Original Message -----
  > From: "SySt3M" <syst3m at downclan.com>
  > To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
  > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 12:16 PM
  > Subject: Re: [bf1942] Punkbuster confirmed for 1.6
  > 
  > 
  > > I'm the same, I think its great that DICE are at least 
  > addressing the
  > issue.
  > >
  > > >i disagree
  > 
  > 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20031202/d62f1ac9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Bf1942 mailing list