[bf1942] Patch petition
tms3
tms3 at fsklaw.net
Thu Apr 24 08:03:06 EDT 2003
I'll put in my two cents here.
I, and most of my mates, hardly play much these days because of all the
freaking cheaters. I could give a flying f... if private mods are
available as long as the cheating is stopped. It would be so nice if I
was driving a brand new Tiger and some little cheating loser in a
Sherman would no longer be able to vape me with a near miss.
Just my opinion...
Arne Kühl wrote:
>there should be a serverside setting if client-mods should be activated or
>disabled...
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Maarten De Meyer" <keats at prophecy.be>
>To: <bf1942 at icculus.org>
>Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2003 11:35 AM
>Subject: [bf1942] Patch petition
>
>
>
>
>>This may not be linux related; but it sure is serveradmin and patch 1.4
>>thus linux-server related, but forgive me if you consider this to be in
>>the wrong place.
>>
>>I just wanted to ask dice not to take the anti-anti-cheat petition too
>>seriously. It is a petition started by a disgruntled modmaker refusing
>>to make his mod client-side, it was started without the knowledge that
>>the client-side-mod blocking would be a serverside option, and if you
>>read the comments you will see that it is mostly signed by ignorant kids
>>that are afraid they wont be able to play Desert Combat anymore.
>>
>>So please, make the 1.4 as it was announced (that is, excellent), and
>>let the storm in a glass of water blow over :)
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://icculus.org/pipermail/bf1942/attachments/20030424/507d5e0a/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bf1942
mailing list