[bf1942] Linux server status report 2003-04-22

[Sam Evans]

Nor could I.  If gcc3's not supported by Linux compat then we're still sol
even though the BSD Core supports gcc3.. :(



On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Killing wrote:

> gcc3 is a supported FreeBSD port already. Cant find any reference to the Linux compat v3.
>
>     Steve / K
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fredriksson, Andreas" <andreas.fredriksson at dice.se>
> To: "'Sam Evans '" <sam at neuroflux.com>; <bf1942 at icculus.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 5:21 PM
> Subject: RE: [bf1942] Linux server status report 2003-04-22
>
>
> >
> > Sam,
> >
> > could you please investigate the status of gcc3 binaries under FreeBSD
> > (with and without emulation)?
> >
> > I'd be interested in seeing what we can do with this.
> >
> > // Andreas
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sam Evans
> > To: bf1942 at icculus.org
> > Sent: 4/22/2003 5:15 PM
> > Subject: Re: [bf1942] Linux server status report 2003-04-22
> >
> >
> > - inline -
> >
> > On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, Fredriksson, Andreas wrote:
> >
> > >   The dynamic binary works out of the box on Gentoo 1.4 and RH9, but
> > > possibly also
> > >   on other gcc3-based distros. The static binary also works on RH 7.3
> > for
> > > example.
> >
> > So, it looks as if all those people who are running FreeBSD are SOL with
> > the 1.4 release.  I don't think the linux-compat ports have been
> > upgraded
> > to include gcc3 yet......
> >
> > Now, I might be wrong..  But if this is the case, this will be the final
> > nail in the BF1942 coffin for me at least..
> >
> >
>
>