[bf1942] sea bug (nr 288) fixed?

[Kevin Lockitt]

Yes, I tried it then myself and you are quite right. Please ignore my
previous email, the values Bill lists below are correct. I did this test
a while ago under v1.1 and the results are different now. Did something
change???

-----Original Message-----
From: Bill Wood [mailto:wawoodtx at attbi.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, 31 December 2002 22:16
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: RE: [bf1942] sea bug (nr 288) fixed?


Kevin, is that what is generated by the full game in dedicated mode?
Because that is not what I observed to be the generated values from the
dedicated server gui: 0 - No Limit 8 - 64 Kbps 16 - 128 Kbps 32 - 256
Kbps 64 - 512 Kbps 128 - 1024 Kbps 256 - 2048 Kbps 512 - 8192 Kbps 
I am using DedicatedServer.exe dated 11/20/2002 to generate these
values. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Lockitt [mailto:kevin at blackbagops.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2002 4:46 AM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: RE: [bf1942] sea bug (nr 288) fixed?


Here's a list of the valid values and their corresponding mnemonics from
the windows GUI;

0/No Limit
64/64 Kbps
128/128 Kbps
256/256 Kbps
512/512 Kbps
1024/1024 Kbps
2048/2048 Kbps
8192/8192 Kbps

e.g. game.serverBandwidthChokeLimit 64

Kevin Lockitt

www.blackbagops.com


-----Original Message-----
From: ScratchMonkey [mailto:ScratchMonkey at SewingWitch.com] 
Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 11:55 PM
To: bf1942 at icculus.org
Subject: RE: [bf1942] sea bug (nr 288) fixed?


--On Monday, December 30, 2002 1:30 PM -0600 Bill Wood
<wawoodtx at attbi.com> 
wrote:

> You might try playing with ServerBandwidthChokeLimit, it seems to have

> an effect.

What are the valid values for this?