Yo... I'm cool with putting the scripts under revision control. (it only makes sense, and I can't see how else you'd fix problems that will come up)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:59 PM, Peter De Wachter <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:pdewacht@gmail.com">pdewacht@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Op Sun, 13 Jun 2010 23:51:41 +0200<br>
schreef Peter De Wachter <<a href="mailto:pdewacht@gmail.com">pdewacht@gmail.com</a>>:<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> > We should really put the Lua scripts in revision control, and fix<br>
> > bugs there. I'll check with Bit-Blot and see if that's okay<br>
> > (technically, they walk a line between source code and game data, so<br>
> > I need permission first).<br>
><br>
> That would be the best solution.<br>
<br>
</div>If you don't get permission, maybe we should create a simple patch<br>
system for the lua code. It wouldn't need to be complicated. A way to<br>
say, after loading mantis.lua, evaluate this code. That could be used<br>
to redefine the postInit function. That would be a cleaner solution<br>
than hacking string.format, and the mechanism could be reused for other<br>
problems that might pop up.<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
aquaria mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:aquaria@icculus.org">aquaria@icculus.org</a><br>
<a href="http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/aquaria" target="_blank">http://icculus.org/mailman/listinfo/aquaria</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Alec Holowka<br><a href="http://www.infiniteammo.ca">www.infiniteammo.ca</a><br><a href="http://www.bit-blot.com">www.bit-blot.com</a><br>