Finger info for hendersa@icculus.org...


If I knew that updating a .plan file was this entertaining, I would have
started doing semi-regular updates a long time ago.  Oh well.  My web space
is located at http://nuthouse.org/~hendersa and I can be reached via e-mail
at hendersa@icculus.org.

Archived .plan entries can be seen at http://nuthouse.org/~hendersa/finger.

********************************************
* 20 February 2004 - Some financial advice *
********************************************

Here it is.  The way to get rich without trying very hard.  It takes time, 
but it works.  Interested?

You know, ever since I started working on my MBA degree a few years back, 
I've found that a large number of people have fairly flawed thinking in 
regards to business.  In fact, it goes beyond that.  There will always be 
people that think that business is a horrible game that takes advantage of 
the little guy for the benefit of the big guy.  People often live under 
the constant fear that they'll lose their job and be flat broke within a 
month or two, if not immediately.  The concepts of pensions and social 
security are eroding away, and the idea that a company will take of its 
workers after retirement is antiquated.

In short, it's time for all you smart folks out there to take a step back 
and figure out what is really going on in business.  Better yet, you need 
to figure out how to make these shifts in the business world work for you, 
rather than against you.  I've been an engineer from day one.  I graduated 
from college with a degree in computer science, and I've been flipping the 
bits for a living ever since then.  I rode the dot-com bubble until it 
burst, and I lived through the mad scramble of finding a tech job when the 
market went soft.  Like it or not, high-tech jobs are not necessarily a 
commodity.  

My observations are that high-tech support and maintenance jobs are, in 
the business world, viewed as overhead.  Take the system administrators 
that keep IT systems chugging along without a hitch.  These efforts are 
noteworthy, and the current salaries of experienced sys-admins reflects 
this.  But, how does this directly relate to the products that the company 
sells?  The salary of the sys-admin is recovered by allocating a tiny 
percentage of the profit from every good sold by the company.  In this 
regard, the cost of maintaining the IT infrastructure of a company is an 
overhead expense imposed on all products the company sells.  The IT job 
sector has become the janitorial staff of the 21st century. 

With big businesses viewing our jobs as overhead expense, it's no wonder 
that our jobs are being outsourced, down-sized, and "right-sized".  You 
have no more right to a good living than someone who digs ditches for a 
living, files paperwork in an office, or is CEO of a large corporation.  
You aren't anything special.  With a few rare exceptions, your skills are 
easily replacable by people living anywhere from across the street to 
across the world.    

There are people out there that are willing to do your job for less money.  
It is for this reason that it becomes important for you to understand how 
to handle your finances and prepare for the future.  IT employment is a 
volatile state of affairs right now, and you're going to get stung in the 
future if you don't have a good plan in place.

Many egos are undoubtedly hurt by this reasoning.  You've all spent 
all-nighters fixing something and spared your company some incredible 
expense.  You know how indispensible you are to your organization.  Your 
knowledge of your company's infrastructure is reason alone to secure your 
job.  You know that you are unreplaceable, right?  Well... maybe.  
Granted, you're probably unreplaceable right this second.  But what about 
in a year?  Two years?  Three?  How secure are you in your skill set?  
Will you be able to master all the buzzword technologies popping up?  Does 
upper management even know who you are?

Ready to hear a lot of things you aren't going to like?  Here is how you 
break the dependency on the income from your job.

First off, take a good look at where your money goes each month.  You're 
probably going to go through the process that most people with a decent 
income go through when they decide if they can afford something.  You'll 
take the amount of your paycheck, subtract the cost of your utility bills 
and such, subtract your fixed payments (car, rent, etc.), and subtract 
your more flexible expenses (credit card, food, entertainment).  Knowing 
the general geek penchant for toys, DVDs, equipment, and entertainment, 
I'll bet the amount of money left at the end of the month is probably 
rather small.  Sometimes, it'll even be negative (around, say, the 
Christmas season or other periods of heavy spending).  Pretty depressing, 
right?

It doesn't take too long to get wiped out when you are in this situation.  
All it takes is an unexpected layoff or sudden expense to really upset the 
apple cart.  Suddenly, those fixed expenses are tearing you apart each 
month.  And you don't need me to tell you that "that ain't good".  When 
coupled with the realization that people are standing in line to take your 
position for less money, this upgrades to "that really, really ain't 
good".  So what to do?

Let's lump the two ends of that balancing act into the categories of 
"assets" and "liabilities".  If it puts money in your pocket, it's an 
asset.  If it takes money out, it's a liability.

Well, there is a line of reasoning in the book "Rich Dad, Poor Dad" by 
Robert Kiyosaki that sums up this situation rather well.  The idea is that 
the "poor" struggle just to purchase the most basic of liabilities (such 
as paying utility bills).  The "rich" purchase assets (such as stocks, 
bonds, or property... things that generate income).  The "middle class" 
purchase liabilities that they think are assets (such as a car or a 
house).  

I can't say that I agree with Kiyosaki 100% on his reasoning.  He believes 
in a pure dollars and cents approach to everything, which isn't, in my 
opinion, a healthy approach to every problem.  He also advocates paying 
"yourself first", which equates to paying your bills late in an effort to 
purchase more assets.  The book also suffers from the general problem of 
most pop finance books: a good idea is presented and then repeated over 
and over in enough different ways as to fill 200 pages.  While I would 
suggest the book as interesting reading, I'd also advise you to take it 
with a grain of salt.  I think that a standard finance textbook that gives 
a good description of the capital asset pricing model and weighted average 
cost of capital would explain the concept in a far more meaningful way.  
But hey... what can I say?  We engineers like formulas and graphs.

Unlike Kiyosaki, I believe that you receive utility from some liabilities.  
Obviously, if you are paying rent or a mortgage payment each month, there 
are benefits that you derive from these expenses that aren't monetary in 
nature.  You have a place to live and the peace of mind that comes from 
having space that is yours.  But, setting aside the idea of usage utility, 
these liabilities do take money out of your pocket each month.

Have you ever known someone, even yourself, to have an income far greater 
than their expenses for a long period of time?  It does happen, but it 
goes a bit against human nature.  Most people will increase their standard 
of living as their paycheck increases.  Perhaps you'll move into a nicer 
apartment or buy a house.  Maybe you'll trade in your current car for a 
nicer one with higher payments.  It's possible that you'll buy one of 
those televisions that can be seen from space.  If you've been working for 
a while, can you honestly look back at when you just got out of college 
and say that you still have the same amount of liabilities each month as 
you did back then?

So, you have two approaches to combating the drain that liabilities have 
on your assets.  You can either reduce your liabilities or increase your 
assets.  Pretty simple, right?  Either reduce the negative cash flow or 
increase the positive cash flow.  Note that I'm refering to cash flows 
when speaking about assets.  True, you can buy a DVD and claim it is a 
personal asset.  After all, it's something you receive utility from, and 
it isn't costing you anything beyond the initial purchase price.  But I'd 
like to open up an account with your bank if that bank will let you 
deposit DVDs!  Therefore, buying toys isn't going to effect the 
asset-liability balancing other than decreasing the cash you have on-hand.

Undoubtedly, there are people sneering at this and saying that they 
contribute to an IRA or 401k account and are just fine.  I see no problems 
with this aside from the fact that you can't touch the money until you are 
59.5 years old without incurring a nice little zing from the IRS to the 
tune of 10%.  If that is what makes you comfortable, then consider the 
advice I am about to give you to apply to you when you are 60 years old.  
But, I think you'd be better served by applying this advice as soon as you 
can.

First, figure out the nature of the negative cash flows you have.  Can the 
minimum payments for your negative cash flows be reduced, or are they 
fixed payments over a period of time?  An example of a reducable negative 
cash flow would be a credit card payment.  A non-reducable negative cash 
flow would be rent or a car payment.  Make a note of which expenses are 
flexible, and which are fixed.  

Second, figure out the interest accruing on your negative cash flows.  Is 
interest accruing on these cash flows (i.e. interest of a car or mortgage 
loan)?  What are the rates?  8%?  9%?  Even worse?  High interest rates 
can easily inflate your liabilities by hundreds of dollars each year.  By 
identifying where you are paying money for the privlidge of borrowing 
money, you can kill two birds with one stone.

Third, figure out the amount and interest rate on all cash inflows.  How 
much is your net paycheck?  Is it based upon a salary, hourly rate, 
commission, or a combination of these?  If you have investments, how much 
of a return are you getting on them?  Are any of your cash inflows taking 
advantage of compounded interest?

Now that we've gathered the data we need, we can start making our plan.  
The idea is pretty simple, really.  We're going to reduce cash outflows 
from liabilities and increase cash inflows from assets.  Take your total 
cash inflows and divide it by the total cash outflows.  If you get a 
result less than 1.0, you are in immediate danger with no breathing room 
at all.  You can start feeling more relaxed when the ratio passes 1.5, and 
at 2.0 you are in very good shape with a decent amount of discretionary 
income.   

One of the best things you can do to encourage improvement is to measure 
it.  Constantly.  People tend to act more responsibly and set aside 
short-term gain for long-term gain if they think their choices are being 
monitored.  The only one seeing this will probably be you, but there is a 
chance you'll want to provide this information to an accountant or broker 
later.  But, it's mostly a psychological push to do the "right thing". 

So, you now have two new goals based upon the ratio above.  One goal is 
long-term, and the other is short-term.  

Your short-term goal is to make the above ratio exceed 2.0 when you 
include your paycheck as an asset in the ratio.  By having your cash 
inflows that are twice your cash outflows, you can pay your bills, invest 
some money, and still have a little left over for enjoyment.  If you are 
close to the 1.0 mark on the ratio, you need to either reconsider your 
line of work or visit a credit counselling agency for help on reducing 
your liabilities.  Refinancing loans and fully utilizing promotional APRs 
on credit cards really helps lower the amount of money you lose to 
interest.  Cutting down the phone bill can really help, but I would advise 
against cutting your grocery budget.  Cutting your budget for dining out, 
however, is a good move.  Simply cut spending where you can.

Your long-term goal is to make the above ratio exceed 1.0 when you 
completely remove any paycheck from the picture.  Impossible you say?  
Hardly.  Returns on a stable, small-cap mutual fund over the last 5 years 
run about 10%-15%.  Take a look at performance of the Armada, Baron, 
Bjurman Barry, BlackRock, BNY Hamilton funds if you don't believe me (and 
that's just a few of the hundreds out there... I just picked a few from 
the front of the list).  These funds often did far better than 10%-15%; 
30% returns were actually fairly common.  Real estate and rental property 
not only generate cash flow, but they appreciate and hedge against 
inflation as well.  In fact, real estate can be sold, the proceeds applied 
to new property purchases, and you don't have to pay taxes on the profit 
thanks to section 1031 of the tax code.  

In short, once you purchase assets that are capable of making money, they 
will continue to make money even when you are not.  Plus, reinvestment of 
the cash flows will continue to increase the ratio (unless you increase 
your liabilities, that is).  Remember the old adage of "work smarter, not 
harder"?  The money works hard.  You work smart.  

These goals are all well and good, but how do you "buy assets"?  After 
all, buying real estate can be tricky business, it's awfully hard to 
invest in a mutual fund when you have no clue what you are doing, and it 
seems a lot smarter to put extra money into the principle of your mortgage 
rather than invest it in something risky.  I'll admit, those are pretty 
good points.  So, you need to sit down and consider whether reducing 
liabilities is a better strategy than increasing assets.  

If the interest rate on your mortgage is 8% or so, and you can make 15% in 
a mutual fund, why not put the money towards mutual funds?  8% of the 15% 
return covers the interest you would pay on the mortgage, so you certainly 
come out ahead.  But, some people are very risk-adverse and would want to 
pay off the mortgage rather than invest money when they still have debt.  
It's all up to you, really.  Just keep in mind that there are limits as to 
how far you can reduce liabilities, there are no limits to how much you 
can increase assets, and the risk premium between your mortgage and a good 
mutual fund is far higher than the actual risk.  The interest rates of 
your liabilities and your potential sensible assets should dictate your 
actions.

When you decide that you should be buying assets, you're on the right 
track.  If the cash flow from assets pays for your car or home, the cash 
flow will most likely still be there after the car or house is paid off.  
Asset cash flows can offset on-going liabilities such as property tax or 
insurance.  Cash flow is really the only thing that separates the haves 
from the have-nots, if you think about it.

Now we can get back to buying assets.  First off, max out your Roth IRA 
($3000) each year.  Period.  The savings on taxes alone make it an 
extremely wise investment, and you can contribute in small amounts to it 
as you go without any outlandish fees.  Get some cash in the IRA and buy 
some reputable mutual funds with it.  Then let it sit and auto-reinvest in 
itself with the dividends.  For the truly cheap folks out there, go to 
your local bank and ask about opening a Roth IRA with them.  They'll be 
tripping over themselves to offer you all sorts of information.  Once you 
learn what you want to know, go open a Roth IRA with someone like E-Trade 
or Charles Schwabb so that you can buy stocks online with the IRA funds 
without having to go through a broker.  You can't pull the money out until 
you are 59.5 years old, but it'll be tax free.  All of it.  All the 
original money, all the capital gains, the dividends... everything.  
Pretty neat, eh?  There are worse fates than having all your retirement 
income tax-free.

After you max out the Roth IRA, you have some decisions to make.  There 
are a lot of places to stash money if you know where to look.

Paying off current debt is always a popular choice.  This works out well 
when you are at the beginning of a car loan or mortgage.  It's the "sure 
thing" because you know exactly how much of a return you are getting on 
your investment.  If you have a mortgage at 8% and you pay off $1000 of 
it, you'll "make" a touch more than $80 within the next 12 months.

You could buy some rental property, but this could be prohibitively 
expensive depending on where you are located.  Southern California isn't 
the best place for this sort of thing if you are a starting investor, for 
example.  A chat with some of the local real estate agents will get you a 
considerable amount of information on current offerings and the general 
climate of the local market.  Just remember who the info is coming from 
and take it with a grain of salt.  Remember to start small and step up to 
larger properties via the 1031 tax loophole.  When you turn your $20,000 
investment in a trailer you rent (actually, more like a $2,000 investment, 
since you only are putting in a down payment and the rent pays the rest) 
into a $150,000 house that you own in the clear in 10 years, you'll be 
amazed.  If this sounds good to you, check out property management 
companies in your area and look for proposed sites for new shopping 
centers and schools.  If you can guess where property values will jump, 
you can make an excellent return when you trade-up.

Continuing to invest in the stock market via mutual funds is a good 
choice.  I'd steer clear of investing in single stocks unless you have a 
widely diversified portfolio of such stocks.  Stocks and mutual funds can 
be both short and long term investements, and it is this flexibility that 
draw a lot of people to them.  Avoid hunches and do some solid research on 
what stocks and funds you want to buy.

Bonds are an interesting investment for those that like to know exactly 
what they are getting.  Bond funds also have the added advantage of 
arbitrage as interest rates fluctuate.  Triple tax-free municipal bonds 
are a very wise investment once your tax rate breaks 30%.  Not only are 
the monies received from the TTF munis completely tax free (federal, state, 
and local taxes), but the funds are used to improve your municipality.  
Bonds work best when interest rates are high, so stay away from them for 
another two or three years. 

To sum this up:

- Avoid gaining new liabilities until you have the non-paycheck asset 
cashflow to cover them.
- Your short-term goal is to live well within your means and avoid 
incurring new liabilities (ratio of 2.0 or greater with your paycheck). 
- Your long-term goal is to offset the liabilities you'll encounter when 
you retire with cash inflows generated by your assets (ratio of 1.0 or 
greater without your paycheck).
- Stick with mutual funds until you know what you are doing.

One last thing that I'll probably hear about from you folks is the idea of 
saving a chunk of money and then spending it little by little during 
retirement.  I assert that this will require you to do some calcuations 
based upon when you think you're going to die, which isn't a very cheery 
proposition.  Plus, you end your life with nothing in the bank.  Nothing 
is left as a legacy for your children, spouse, community, or favorite 
charity.  Granted, you can't take it with you, but it can be used to give 
people chances that they wouldn't have otherwise had.

Think about it.
    

When this .plan was written: 2004-02-21 07:31:44
.plan archives for this user are here (RSS here).
Powered by IcculusFinger v2.1.24
Have her shaven and brought to my tent.